A. Objective The learners should be able to investigate changes that happen in the absence of oxygen. B. Materials ● fire. Activity: TITLE: ABSENCE OF OXYGEN Jar with cover (Jar A) Jar without cover (Jar B) 2 same sized candle (small) Match or lighter Timer Ruler C. Precautionary Measure Remember to handle match or lighter carefully and don't play with it for it can cause D. Procedure 1. Label the jar with cover with Jar A and the jar without cover as Jar B. 2. Light the candles with a match and put the candles in each jar. 3. Record the time when the candles are lighted and the time when the light was put off. 4. Cover the Jar A and observe what will happen. 5. Measure the length of the candles after the flame was put off. 6. Record your findings on the chart below. Jars JAR A JAR B Time of the flame was put off Length of the candle after burning Answer the following questions: 1. Which of the 2 jars was the candle's flame put off first? 2. Which of the two candles has the shortest size? 3. What happen, when you cover the Jar A? 4. When the lighted candle in Jar A was covered, the flame was put off, what is the reason why the candle's flame did not continue to burn? 5. What are the 3 main components in combustion? Doss​

3. Electoral College. Representation in the Electoral College is not proportional due to the addition of two extra seats as a result of the Senators for that state. Electors are also appointed rather than chosen by ballot in many states. The system of safe seats and winner take all methods in results undermines the democratic one man one vote element of Presidential elections.
4. Representation in the Senate. Each state has two senators, regardless of size, which, Dahl argues, is undemocratic as smaller states have an increased prominence than they would otherwise have.
5. Election of Senators. When writing the Constitution, the Senate has to be appointed by the states rather than elected. It wasn't until the Seventeenth Amendment that direct election was introduced.​ please help me make me an explanation all of them

Answer:

Sure! Here are explanations for each of the points you mentioned:

3. Electoral College: The Electoral College is a system used in the United States to elect the President. One of the criticisms of this system is that representation in the Electoral College is not proportional. This is because each state is allocated a certain number of electors based on their total number of representatives in Congress, which includes two extra seats for each state's Senators. This means that smaller states have a proportionally larger representation in the Electoral College compared to their population size. Additionally, in many states, electors are appointed rather than chosen by ballot, which some argue undermines the democratic principle of one person, one vote. Furthermore, the winner-take-all method used in most states means that the candidate who wins the popular vote in a state receives all of that state's electoral votes, which can lead to the exclusion of minority voices and a distortion of the overall popular vote.

4. Representation in the Senate: The Senate, the upper house of the United States Congress, provides equal representation to each state, regardless of its size or population. This means that each state, regardless of whether it has a large or small population, has two senators. Critics argue that this is undemocratic because it gives smaller states a disproportionate amount of power and influence compared to their population size. As a result, the votes of citizens in smaller states have a greater impact on national legislation than the votes of citizens in larger states. This can lead to an imbalance in representation and decision-making, where the interests of smaller states may prevail over the interests of larger states.

5. Election of Senators: Initially, when the United States Constitution was written, Senators were not directly elected by the people. Instead, they were appointed by state legislatures. This was seen as a way to ensure that the Senate represented the interests of the states as political entities. However, over time, there were concerns about corruption and lack of accountability in the appointment process. As a result, the Seventeenth Amendment was ratified in 1913, which established the direct election of Senators by the people. This amendment aimed to increase the democratic nature of the Senate by giving citizens the power to directly choose their Senators.

I hope these explanations help! If you have any more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask.

Answer:

3. Electoral College:

Representation in the Electoral College is not proportional due to the addition of two extra seats in each state as a result of the Senators for that state. This means that smaller states, which have two Senators and therefore two additional electoral votes, have a larger influence on the outcome of the presidential election compared to their population size. Additionally, the method of appointing electors rather than choosing them by popular ballot in many states and the winner-take-all approach in most states undermines the democratic principle of one person, one vote as it can lead to a situation where the candidate who wins the popular vote in a state does not receive any electoral votes.

4. Representation in the Senate:

Each state has an equal representation in the Senate with two senators, regardless of the state's size or population. As argued by Dahl, this can be seen as undemocratic because it gives smaller states a disproportionate influence in the legislative process. This means that residents of smaller states have a greater individual impact on national policies and legislation compared to those in more populous states.

5. Election of Senators:

When the Constitution was written, the Senate was initially designed to be appointed by the state legislatures rather than by direct election from the public. This meant that Senators were essentially chosen by state governments rather than by the citizens themselves. The introduction of the Seventeenth Amendment allowed for the direct election of Senators, which increased the democratic accountability of the Senate and tied the representation more closely to the will of the people.